Global Perspectives on Education: A Cross-Cultural Comparisons in the Philippines and Cambodia
Keywords:
Education, Innovation, Localization, Standardization, Comparison.Abstract
Education is a central pillar for economic growth and societal development in any country. Many developing nations such as the Philippines and Cambodia face extensive barriers in establishing high-quality, equitable education structures to meet the needs of all citizens. The objective of this case study is to offer the examination of education systems in the Philippines and Cambodia and analyzes persistent inequities in access, variable quality and lack of inclusion, especially for remote, poor and minority groups. As methodology, the related information and documents will be collected and reviewed to draw the main constraints, challenges and socio-economic disparities in accessing to the education. Results showed that strategies like decentralized governance, multilingual instruction and community school models that catalyze localized innovation are highlighted as means to enhance access and belonging within wider quality assurance frameworks. The core recommendation promotes integrated community-driven education enabling contextual decision-making on key functions while still meeting national benchmarks. This balances flexibility and consistency. Progressive decentralization stages include localized piloting, legal expansions of school authority, budget direct allocations, integrating informal programs, phased function transfers based on assessments, ongoing monitoring and evaluations driving improvements. Key insights spotlight how innovation and cooperation aid localization that respects diversity while quality depends on appropriate standardization and supports. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the challenges and opportunities within the education systems of the Philippines and Cambodia, a set of strategic recommendations is needed to propose to advance towards more inclusive and community-driven models of education. This approach empowers communities to take ownership over key functions based on contextual needs while upholding minimum quality standards. It balances localization and flexibility with wider systemic consistency.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Authors
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.