Examination of Hostility in Critical Media Discourse Analysis

https://doi.org/10.55529/jmcc.42.28.39

Authors

  • Nawal Fadhil Abbas College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Shahad Saad Eidan College of Education for Women, University of Baghdad, Iraq.

Keywords:

Aggression, Anger, Critical Media Discourse, Hate Speech, Hostility, Prejudice.

Abstract

This paper provides a review of scholarly research on the depiction of hostility in critical media discourse analysis. The study is intended to analyze how hostility is differently portrayed and manifested in media discourse. The review begins by defining the multifaceted concept of hostility, encompassing cognitive, emotive, and behavioral dimensions. It then outlines the systematic process used to identify, gather and purposely select 30 relevant articles to hostility in media discourse. The method involves selecting 100 initial articles and gradually refining them to 30 articles that specifically address the themes of racism, anger, hate speech, prejudice, and aggression. These articles are sourced from diverse academic journals and platforms, using refined search strategies to ensure relevance and depth. The findings reveal that media outlets, whether through news reporting, entertainment media, or political rhetoric, play a significant role in perpetuating or challenging hostility-related societal attitudes. Subtle forms of racism embedded in media narratives, amplification of anger and hate speech, reinforcement of prejudiced views, and the sentimentalization of aggressive behaviors have all been identified as common strategies employed by the media. This study highlights the media's role in mitigating societal tensions, offering insights into the strategic portrayal of hostility that influences public perception and contributes to broader societal dynamics.

Published

2024-03-03

How to Cite

Nawal Fadhil Abbas, & Shahad Saad Eidan. (2024). Examination of Hostility in Critical Media Discourse Analysis. Journal of Media, Culture and Communication, 4(02), 28–39. https://doi.org/10.55529/jmcc.42.28.39

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.